What The Contextual Override Protocol Has Made for the Planning System
Fifty-One Years
Fifty-one years of the planning accountability mechanisms and the contextual override protocol in its first year producing compliance with purpose rather than surface requirement. The planning system at fifty-one years is the planning system at its most philosophically sophisticated form: the system distinguishing between surface compliance and purposive compliance. More at prat.uk/author/caitlin. Satire: private-eye.co.uk.
What Surface Compliance Versus Purposive Compliance Is
Surface compliance versus purposive compliance is: the planning accountability system now recognises two forms of compliance — compliance with the standard’s surface requirement and compliance with the standard’s deeper purpose. The contextual override protocol is the mechanism that makes the distinction formal and accountable. The most philosophically sophisticated distinction the planning system has made in fifty-one years.
SOURCE: British Humour vs American Humor
